Expend4bles
Expend4bles
Starring Jason Statham, Sylvester Stallone, Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson, Megan Fox
Directed by Scott Waugh
Expendable leader Barney Ross (Sylvester Stallone) reunites with his old team including Lee Christmas (Jason Statham), Gunner Jensen (Dolph Lundgren) and Toll Road (Randy Couture) - along with newcomers Easy Day (Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson) and Galan (Jacob Scipio) who's the son of former member Galgo (Antonio Banderas) to stop mercenary Suarto Rahmat (Iko Uwaits) from stealing nuclear detonators for a mysterious unknown benefactor known as Ocelot who plans to use it to ignite World War III between America and Russia. The mission goes awry and Lee is kicked out of the team for disobeying orders.
They get another shot when CIA Agent Marsh (Andy Garcia) discovers a boat containing the nuclear detonator (as well as the nuke itself) on its way to Russia, and new team leader Gina (Megan Fox) - who's also Lee's girlfriend - takes the team (including newcomer Lash, played by Levy Tran) to the boat to prevent the next world war, with Lee in pursuit.
The Good:
To an extent "Expend4bles" delivers what the first two films did as well - provide wall-to-wall blood and violence, shedding the PG-13 rating that the third was chained to in favor of full-on R-rated goodness. There's lots of explosions, bodies getting riddled with bullets, and knives slicing through skin to satisfy even the casual action connoisseur, and ultimately that's the point of the film: it doesn't try to be anything highly cerebral, thought-provoking or emotional: they exist to see things go boom and blood flow from open orifices.
It's easy to bash the film for its terrible script, but that's the charm of the film series. They're throwbacks to the classic 80s action films where Russia was always the enemy, and there's always a new World War on the horizon. To that end "Expend4bles" holds true, as once again the threat of a US/Russia war looms heavily and the generic MacGuffin of a nuclear bomb is in play. There's not much more needed than that, and the film doesn't offer more than that - and that's just fine, as again we don't go into these films looking for something of substance when it comes to storytelling.
The Bad:
In a world where the likes of "John Wick" introduce stylish, visually stunning action sequences (the Dragon's Breath scene in "John Wick 4" is easily the best action sequence I've seen in decades), you need to up your game when it comes to action, and sadly this is where "Expend4bles" remains stuck in the past. The set pieces are things you've seen numerous times before, and the action is as vanilla as they come. Lots of unnamed enemies get shot over and over, just different scenery. The camera remains motionless and there's no grand sweeping shots, no intense first-person POV, no guiding through the battle - just well placed shots that somehow makes intense action sequences look as entertaining as paint running down the wall.
The strength of the franchise was always on its heavy nostalgic leaning toward casting classic 80s action stars, and they should've learned their lesson with the third film: but it seems they didn't. Only Stallone, Statham, Lundgren and Couture return, shells of what they once were, and the addition of "50 Cent," Jacob Scipio (who?), Levy Tran (who?), and Megan Fox (why?) don't do much to invigorate the senses. Fox in particular is an odd choice, as she doesn't seem like the intense action heroine the likes of Charlize Theron, Scarlett Johansson, Milla Jovovich, Gal Gadot or Michelle Rodriguez would bring. She never breaks a sweat, her skin is always pristine, and her hair is always perfectly bouncy even as she's shooting the bad guys. Only Iko Uwais and Tona Jaa (criminally underused) brought a fresh sense of action to the film, while the others just seemed to exist.
Stallone's participation in the film itself is very short, existing almost as a glorified cameo in a franchise he started, and the bulk of the story rests on Jason Statham's shoulders. While he admirably holds his own, this feels more like a Jason Statham action film than an "Expendables" one, and the film is sorely missing on the comradere between Stallone and Statham that made the other films so enjoyable.
The effects and CGI are laughably bad. The blood looks as fake as using CGI ketchup, and the backgrounds are oddly off-balance. It's obvious most of the film is shot on a stage with green screens behind it, and it shows in the most horrible ways.
The Summary:
A sequel long past its prime, "Expend4bles" lives up to its offbeat title and should've been called "Expendfoibles" as it's the weakest of the franchise, limping along like someone well past their prime and should've stayed in the retirement home.
The Score: C
Comments
Post a Comment